Effect of Load Balancing Bonding and Failover on Speed, Latency, Average, and Packet Loss
Abstract
This study compares the performance between using load balancing bonding and not using load balancing bonding. This test was conducted on a virtual environment VMware and applied to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network. The configuration was carried out on two routers connected with three virtual cables that function as load balancing bonding, for the computer to function as a load balancing bonding test. In this study, the workload given consisted of 1000 package. The results of this study showed better performance with load balancing bonding compared to without load balancing bonding, shown in the default condition, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode being higher with a value of 0,157Mbps (Tx) and 3.4Mbps (Rx). Latency with Balance Round Robin mode is smaller with a value of 729ms. The average with Balance Round Robin mode is higher with a value of 768bps. While the packet loss has the same result, namely 0% no lost packets were found. In failover conditions, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode is still higher with a value of 0,107Mbps (Tx) and 2.2Mbps (Rx). The value is obtained from testing conducted on Bandwidth Test and Traceroute tools. It can be concluded that the use of load balancing bonding can provide a significant effect on improving network performance both when used in default conditions and in failover conditions based on speed, failover, latency, average, packet loss parameters in the research that has been conducted.
References
[2] S. Almakdi, A. Aqdus, R. Amin, and M. S. Alshehri, “An Intelligent Load Balancing Technique for Software Defined Networking Based 5G Using Machine Learning Models,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. September, pp. 105082–105104, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3317513.
[3] M. R. Belgaum, S. Musa, M. M. Alam, and M. M. Su’Ud, “A Systematic Review of Load Balancing Techniques in Software-Defined Networking,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 98612–98636, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995849.
[4] F. Hariadi, P. Alfa Ray Leo Lede, and U. Melvy Kalaway, “The Effect Of Load Balancing And Failover Of Two Wide Area Networks With Per Connection Classifier Method On Qos Throughput, Packet Loss, Qos Delay, And Qos Jitter,” JOINCS (Journal Informatics, Network, Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 42–48, 2021, doi: 10.21070/joincs.v4i2.1502.
[5] A. Carlsson, D. Ageyev, Y. Sadykov, and V. Sokolov, “Sustainability Research of the Secure Wireless Communication System with Channel Reservation,” Proc. - 15th Int. Conf. Adv. Trends Radioelectron. Telecommun. Comput. Eng. TCSET 2020, no. 1, pp. 973–977, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TCSET49122.2020.235583.
[6] Y. Supriadi, I. A. Sobari, and R. F. Amir, “Optimalisasi Jaringan Komputer Menggunakan Vpn Concentrator Dengan Bonding Pada Pt Maxindo Mitra Solusi Jakarta,” J. Infortech, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2021, doi: 10.31294/infortech.v3i1.10493.
[7] R. Muhammad, M. Iqbal, and R. Mayasari, “Implementasi dan Analisis Performa Bonding Interface Mode 802.3ad sebagai Link Redundancy pada Router Mikrotik,” pp. 1–8, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.02935
[8] F. Firmansyah, M. Wahyudi, and R. A. Purnama, “Virtual Link Aggregation Network Performance Using MikroTik Bonding,” IAIC Trans. Sustain. Digit. Innov., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2020, doi: 10.34306/itsdi.v2i2.394.
[9] Y. Wang, S. Feng, H. Guo, X. Qiu, and H. An, “A Single-Link Failure Recovery Approach Based on Resource Sharing and Performance Prediction in SDN,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 174750–174763, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957141.
[10] A. Mahapatra, S. K. Majhi, K. Mishra, R. Pradhan, D. C. Rao, and S. K. Panda, “An Energy-Aware Task Offloading and Load Balancing for Latency-Sensitive IoT Applications in the Fog-Cloud Continuum,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. January, pp. 14334–14349, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3357122.
[11] S. Manzoor, Z. Chen, Y. Gao, X. Hei, and W. Cheng, “Towards QoS-Aware Load Balancing for High Density Software Defined Wi-Fi Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 117623–117638, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004772.
[12] J. Anselmi, “Combining size-based load balancing with round-robin for scalable low latency,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 886–896, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPDS.2019.2950621.
[13] M. Hamdan et al., “A comprehensive survey of load balancing techniques in software-defined network,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 174, p. 102856, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102856.
[14] D. A. Shafiq, N. Z. Jhanjhi, A. Abdullah, and M. A. Alzain, “A Load Balancing Algorithm for the Data Centres to Optimize Cloud Computing Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 41731–41744, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065308.
[15] D. E. Kurniawan, H. Arif, N. Nelmiawati, A. H. Tohari, and M. Fani, “Implementation and analysis ipsec-vpn on cisco asa firewall using gns3 network simulator,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2019, p. 012031.
[16] D. E. Kurniawan, I. Ahmad, M. R. Ridho, F. Hidayat, and A. A. Js, “Analysis of performance comparison between Software-Based iSCSI SAN and Hardware-Based iSCSI SAN,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1351, no. 1, p. 012009, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1351/1/012009.
[17] M. Mufadhol, G. Aryotejo, and D. E. Kurniawan, “The Network Planning Concept for Increase Quality of Service using Packet Tracer,” in 2019 2nd International Conference on Applied Engineering (ICAE), Oct. 2019, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICAE47758.2019.9221675.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Penulis yang telah mempublikasikan artikel pada JAIC menyatakan setuju bahwa:
1. Artikel belum dan tidak pernah dipublikasikan sebelumnya pada jurnal ilmiah lain, prosiding ataupun jurnal elektronik lainnya.
2. Artikel yang telah diserahkan menjadi hak penuh kepada pengelola JAIC Politeknik Negeri Batam
3. Artikel diperbolehkan untuk dishare ke khalayak untuk meningkatkan produktivitas rujukan dan sitasi dari naskah yang telah terbit.
